Freeman Dyson News, Pictures & Buzz

2020 all-district football teams around Central Texas | High School  Waco Tribune-Herald

Falling CO2 Emissions Expose 'Global Warming' Alarmism As Anti-Science  RealClearMarkets

Missions to the moon and asteroids, phosphine on Venus and SpaceX flights marked 2020 – Outer Messenger  KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper

Prep wrestling: Northside Methodist wins two during tri-match  Dothan Eagle

Washington Nationals 2021 Top 50 Prospects  Prospects1500

The 10 biggest physics stories of 2020  Livescience.com

Three Mathematicians We Lost in 2020  The New Yorker

Princeton Adapts in Year of COVID Pandemic Struggles  Town Topics

Environmental visionaries and villains we lost in 2020  Environmental Health News

The Cost of Visiting Earth May Be Too Astronomical For Aliens  ScienceAlert

Get ready for Starmus VI  Astronomy Magazine

Glaciers Enhance the Biosphere — By Design  Discovery Institute

The Socialism of Freeman Dyson  The Wire Science

Dyson Sphere Program Will Be Coming To Steam's Early Access  Bleeding Cool News

Freeman Dyson Refused to Let Go of His Optimism About the World  Jacobin magazine

Researchers Think Megastructures Can Help Seed Life Throughout the Galaxy  VICE

Humans are 'a species in a very rare planet': cosmologist makes the case against existential dread  CBC.ca

Unscientific science - Newspaper - DAWN.COM  DAWN.com

Book review: Analogia, by George Dyson | E&T Magazine  E&T Magazine

Analogia, by George Dyson — merging with the machines  Financial Times

hey_1028: "There is a great satisfacti@!~ in building good tools for other people to use."--by Freeman Dys@!~

CringeRachel: @insanekiller31 @Philotom Not necessarily. A Dys@!@ swarm (which is actually more reflective of what Freeman Dys@!@ p… https://t.co/NhY9qxkSne

james3neal: RT @NewYorker: Remembering the mathematicians John C@&way, R@&ald Graham, and Freeman Dys@&, who each explored the world with their minds.…

TheAlgoGuy: @EricRWeinstein @JamesOKeefeIII @AndrewYang @MSNBC Exactly. If climate science is settled, Freeman Dys!% wouldn’t q… https://t.co/YLQ9p4xth5

grahamfarmelo: My podcast ‘The Universe Speaks in Numbers’ features interviews with Edward Witten, Steven Weinberg, Karen Uhlenbec… https://t.co/CqLUs6oGwO

That so-called "climate scientists" are hired to support a predetermined conclusion, i.e,. that man-made emissions are causing Global Warming?

Opened up for all to answer.

in science class my teacher showed us this video that was a interview with i think Freeman Dyson (the scientist) and the interview was a voiceover for a video that had waterfalls and flowers and there was some music playing in the background as well. he was talking about how amazing science and life is, and i really want to find it

read this http://ph.search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A2oKmL5Iy4FSLC4A_iyzRwx.;_ylu=X3oDMTByN2RnanRxBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NnMwR2dGlkAw--/SIG=15n4u846h/EXP=1384266696/**http%3a//www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/letters-to-a-heretic-an-email-conversation-with-climate-change-sceptic-professor-freeman-dyson-2224912.html Hmm should climate change skeptics, be called heretics now instead deniers.

I recently asked a question about what people think of Freeman Dyson saying a good scientist should be a skeptic. http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ak3KMb0ae8lUfapWtf4HL1XBFQx.;_ylv=3?qid=20130406020421AAngtsb One of the answers I received stated. "You should read the Wiki article on Dyson. Maybe it will teach you the difference between a skeptic and deniers like yourself. If you don't like Wiki (Dyson does) then read what Dyson says, not some spin doctor's "interpretation". I admire Dyson and am not about to disagree with him on the science. I find it ironic that deniers of global warming think he agrees with them. I also feel that's pretty good proof that deniers don't bother to research anything to do with their opinions - they just look for talking points." Granted I don't know a lot about Freeman Dyson but I agree with him that a good scientist should be skeptical and I think there is a lot of skepticism missing in climatology. From what I've briefly read about his views on climate change, they don't seem to differ much from my own or from most of the "deniers" viewpoints I've read on YA. From Wiki: Dyson: "I'm not saying the warming doesn't cause problems, obviously it does. Obviously we should be trying to understand it. I'm saying that the problems are being grossly exaggerated. They take away money and attention from other problems that are much more urgent and important. Poverty, infectious diseases, public education and public health. Not to mention the preservation of living creatures on land and in the oceans." I believe CO2 should cause an increase in temperatures. I don't believe it is warming as fast as the IPCC has predicted (it's not in fact, alarmists know this and it makes them angry when people point it out). I don't believe there has been an increase in "Extreme Weather" either. I don't believe we should be panicking or throwing away money to fight something that's been completely blown out of proportion. I know Dyson is not a climatologist. I'm just wondering how his views make him a "skeptic" and my views make me a "denier".