Freeman Dyson News, Pictures & Buzz

“Physics explains everything” | Dan Peterson  Patheos

Washington DC: Dr Francis Collins awarded Templeton Prize | ICN  Independent Catholic News

2020 HS boys' soccer preview capsules - News from southeastern Connecticut  theday.com

Where will our inventions lead?  Spectator.co.uk

How Humanity Came To Contemplate Its Possible Extinction: A Timeline  The MIT Press Reader

How big money is powering a massive hunt for alien intelligence  Science Magazine

Book review: Analogia, by George Dyson | E&T Magazine  E&T Magazine

The End of the Universe Will Probably Be Fairly Disappointing  WIRED

It's Weird Down There | In the Pipeline  Science Magazine

Analogia, by George Dyson — merging with the machines  Financial Times

Imperial artist wins award for combining physics and art | Imperial News  Imperial College London

Whatever the Cause, We Are No Accident  Discovery Institute

Gravitons Revealed in the Noise of Gravitational Waves  Quanta Magazine

Why COVID-19 could make physicists kick some of their habits forever  physicsworld.com

Word + Quiz: eschatology  The New York Times

Freeman Dyson (1923–2020)  Science Magazine

Physicists Criticize Stephen Wolfram's 'Theory of Everything'  Scientific American

(Still) Against Degrowth  Forbes

Remembering the Unstoppable Freeman Dyson  Quanta Magazine

Remembering Freeman Dyson  Scientific American

HerrmannPierre: @peterjwever @MattHouben @Alan851603 @VeroW@~land @AukeHoekstra @TomvanderLee @t*yseba "April, 2015" ok, much out… https://t.co/ITVHY5sHpP

DavidHi94512606: RT @PhysInHistory: "We must be careful not to discourage our twelve-year-olds by making them waste the best years of their lives preparing…

hey_1028: "The technologies which have had the most profound effects @# human life are usually simple."--by Freeman Dys@#

SeddityGreen: RT @PhysInHistory: "We must be careful not to discourage our twelve-year-olds by making them waste the best years of their lives preparing…

BossLabsLtd: “When I’m working * a problem, I never think about beauty. I think *ly how to solve the problem. But when I have… https://t.co/dcsocFBWtA

That so-called "climate scientists" are hired to support a predetermined conclusion, i.e,. that man-made emissions are causing Global Warming?

Opened up for all to answer.

in science class my teacher showed us this video that was a interview with i think Freeman Dyson (the scientist) and the interview was a voiceover for a video that had waterfalls and flowers and there was some music playing in the background as well. he was talking about how amazing science and life is, and i really want to find it

read this http://ph.search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A2oKmL5Iy4FSLC4A_iyzRwx.;_ylu=X3oDMTByN2RnanRxBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NnMwR2dGlkAw--/SIG=15n4u846h/EXP=1384266696/**http%3a//www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/letters-to-a-heretic-an-email-conversation-with-climate-change-sceptic-professor-freeman-dyson-2224912.html Hmm should climate change skeptics, be called heretics now instead deniers.

I recently asked a question about what people think of Freeman Dyson saying a good scientist should be a skeptic. http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ak3KMb0ae8lUfapWtf4HL1XBFQx.;_ylv=3?qid=20130406020421AAngtsb One of the answers I received stated. "You should read the Wiki article on Dyson. Maybe it will teach you the difference between a skeptic and deniers like yourself. If you don't like Wiki (Dyson does) then read what Dyson says, not some spin doctor's "interpretation". I admire Dyson and am not about to disagree with him on the science. I find it ironic that deniers of global warming think he agrees with them. I also feel that's pretty good proof that deniers don't bother to research anything to do with their opinions - they just look for talking points." Granted I don't know a lot about Freeman Dyson but I agree with him that a good scientist should be skeptical and I think there is a lot of skepticism missing in climatology. From what I've briefly read about his views on climate change, they don't seem to differ much from my own or from most of the "deniers" viewpoints I've read on YA. From Wiki: Dyson: "I'm not saying the warming doesn't cause problems, obviously it does. Obviously we should be trying to understand it. I'm saying that the problems are being grossly exaggerated. They take away money and attention from other problems that are much more urgent and important. Poverty, infectious diseases, public education and public health. Not to mention the preservation of living creatures on land and in the oceans." I believe CO2 should cause an increase in temperatures. I don't believe it is warming as fast as the IPCC has predicted (it's not in fact, alarmists know this and it makes them angry when people point it out). I don't believe there has been an increase in "Extreme Weather" either. I don't believe we should be panicking or throwing away money to fight something that's been completely blown out of proportion. I know Dyson is not a climatologist. I'm just wondering how his views make him a "skeptic" and my views make me a "denier".